What’s That? You Thought “Pro-Life” Meant Concern For The Unborn?
Many atheists I know, myself included, will from time to time express some empathy for the absract goals of the pro-life movement.
- They are trying to save lives, right?
- Their “value judgement” is noble, if myopic.
- The ultimate goal of a “pro-life” advocate is not entirely dissimilar to many pro-choice proponents.
I have at one time or another defended all three of these propositions. What makes them true is that “the primacy of life” is a good thing to value. Unfortunately for the greater “Pro-Life” movement, valuing life (and the primacy of it) is far from a forgone conclusion.
Surely there are those within the pro-life movement who think that the debate is only about the lives of unborn children. There must exist those people.
Ahh, to be young and innocent….
Don’t be fooled though. For the vast majority of pro-life supporters abortion is just one more extension of a religious culture war. Do they support contraception? Not always. Do they support social programs aimed at making pregnancy feasable for underpriveledged women? Not necessarily. Do they support arming women (and men) with the knowledge necessary to make informed decisions about their sexual health? Rarely.
If you are not against unwanted pregnancy then you are not pro-life. You are anti-abortion.
It becomes even harder for me to believe that the real issue is the ultimate primacy of life if the lives you are so desperate to save are tools to forward a religious agenda.
I submit for your examination this “pro-life” article that appears on “LifeNews”, a “pro-life” website. The article is titled “Godless and ‘Pro-Choice’- So Happy Together For Abortion“, and as you can imagine, it is a clear and moving defense of the lives of unborn children. Note how central the life of the unborn is to the authors argument. Note how the author puts the “priceless lives of children” above any kind of alternative agenda. An excerpt:
Godless. Apparently, it’s a growing trend these days. In the 60s, America was fighting godless racism within our borders and godless Communism overseas. We were also fighting a godless, drug-filled, narcissistic sexual revolution refusing to accept transcendent morality, that found a leader in famed atheist, Madalyn Murray O’Hair.
As an attorney, she led a public crusade against what she regarded as society’s most potent evil—prayer. In the 1963 case of Murray vs. Curlett, she successfully convinced the Supreme Court to ban prayer from public schools. That’s not where the story ends. She spawned a movement that would get publicity like never before, thanks to her provocative obscenity-laced PR, and a media establishment that was growing more antagonistic toward religion. She founded American Atheists, an organization hell-bent on proclaiming God doesn’t exist.
Wait a second! I didn’t read anything in there about unborn children, let alone how valuable they were. Maybe I need to scroll down some…..
We are a country, contrary to many atheists’ historical impairment, founded upon biblical principles that are infused throughout many founding fathers’ writings, including the Declaration of Independence. The AHA’s Humanist Manifesto I and II attempt to excise our country’s Judeo-Christian underpinnings and replace them with their recycled religion of humanism.
Advisory: No babies have been mentioned in the making of this message.
Planned Parenthood’s history and present is rife with animosity toward Christianity unless the abortion giant can use religious folk to justify the mutilation of human life. American Atheists and the AHA believe that modernity is better served without religion. In fact, the AHA’s motto is “Good Without A God”.
No thanks. I’m an advocate for the marriage of reason and faith in a world where moral absolutes still exist.
Fun fact: In the French language the words “reason” and “faith” are both feminine. So at least this guy is for same-sex marriage….
if only rhetorically.